|
| | | |
Functional Analysis
Advantages / Limitations:
|
- As an appropriate tool to conceptualise this general framework,
the functional analysis provides planners with answers to the following
questions:
- Ideal for classifying the settlement pattern according to
functions, for example in rural centres, intermediate and regional
centres according to agglomeration economies
- Assists in determining whether settlements in the region
are equipped with adequate functions which may only need limited
investments to maintain their current advantages.
- Determines settlements that are functionally deficient or
those that could even serve a larger hinterland than is currently the
case.
- Depicts which settlements offer the best potential to be upgraded in order to promote future economic development.
- Highlights settlements that are below the standard level of service and should therefore be designated as remote centres.
- Is useful for assessing settlements that fulfil the threshold values needed to support services and facilities.
|
|
- The settlement pattern assumes that the area being planned is
on a “plain”. In other words, varying geographical conditions such as
mountains and hills are not necessarily reflected in the functional
analysis.
- The analysis merely concentrates on accessibility of
functions to the general public and the tool has to be used in
conjunction with other related methods and tools (e.g. spatial diagram).
- The assumption is that all functions receive the same
weight limits the functional analysis. The different importance of the
functions are not reflected
|
| |
top | Select Methods after category
|