Participatory Needs Assessment - Nutrition and Food Security - Principles and General Procedures
Food and nutrition are very complex issues that are constantly influenced by political, institutional, economic and environmental changes. Therefore, process oriented and flexible methods seem appropriate in order to assess the community’s food and nutritional situation.
Positive efforts towards a better nutrition depend on the ongoing dialogue and relationship between the community and the development worker or intermediary organisation. It is recommended to involve community leader and key persons in the preparatory phase of the Participatory Needs Assessment. Maintaining existing relationships and involving local leaders in any of the assessment steps can facilitate contacts with the villagers and assure the participation of the community.
The Participatory Needs Assessment process for nutrition and food security projects consists of 4 main steps:
Step 1: Preparatory phase with different community agents
a) Generally, there are local institutions working in the selected communities, which can provide important information on nutritional, health, agriculture or other issues. Once the key persons or development agents of local institutions are identified, nutrition related issues can be discussed informally.
b) Sometimes, community based organisations, schools or churches collect data for monitoring purposes. These data can highlight first issues on food and nutrition in the community.
a) Institutions or service providers often exist even in small or remote communities. Make an inventory of any of the existing institution, NGO, technical committee, action group or community based organisation for future cooperation.
b) Promote community meetings to involve local institutions for general discussion on food and nutrition items.
Step 2: Assessment phase with the involved community
a) Sometimes, people are not aware of their food or nutritional needs or problems. Furthermore, food production, nutrition and health habits, consumption pattern and coping strategies of the household change over time. Carrying out a Participatory Needs Assessment should therefore stress the nutrition-related issues of interest in each community (see Table 1).
b) Stimulate dialogue about changes, similarities and constraints between the households, rather than collect data in a questionnaire.
The criteria for a community, for involvement in a nutrition or poverty related project, should be the degree of impact by a nutritional problem or poverty. Procedures of community selection can be applied systematically, if sufficient data is available. (see example PNA). For practical reasons, the development worker who knows the communities from the daily work, should select those that are obviously most in need.
The general rule is to apply Participatory Needs Assessment tools only in communities that will be involved in later project activities.
Table 1: Checklist of nutrition related issues of interest
(Adopted from FAO, 1993)
a) Semi-structured interviews to key persons. Semi-structured interviews are based on a list of guiding questions concerning a specific issue (i.e. nutrition or poverty). They contain pre-formulated answers to the respective questions, but are open for any other aspect that arises during the interview. Questions can be discussed, and new points of view can easily be integrated. The interview is mainly individual. Interview partners during participatory assessment processes are generally key persons, who have specific knowledge or experience on food and nutrition topics.
b) Group discussions about nutritional items with household members. Another method of interviewing villagers is group discussion. A small group of people (8-15) is invited to discuss a specific nutritional topic. The group discussion needs a facilitator to guide the group and to ensure that everybody has the chance to talk. The facilitator should also guarantee that the discussion does not stray too far from its subject. The advantage of group discussions is that the dynamics of a dialogue can encourage people’s participation and point of views concerning a specific problem. Onthe other hand, some discussions tend to be dominated by a limited number of community leaders. Nevertheless, compared to individual inter views, group discussion is the most likely adopted method of communication in many societies.
c) Village or transect walks and mapping. Walking through the village and having informal talks on food and nutritional items are very good starting points for familiarisation with the people and the situation. Important information of the surroundings can also be observed during transects. Local people are normally very eager to explain their living conditions, history and recent changes and serve as able guides during the walk. Households along the way can also be asked whether they have been informed of the participatory assessment methods and how they participate, etc. After the walk, the conclusions have to be drawn and visualised for further planning processes. Maps of the community can help clarify problems and identify solutions, e.g. the location of houses, water sources or other available resources.
d) Problem analysis at community level through a matrix and ranking.
The visualised information gathered during the Participatory Needs Assessment process can be summarised in a diagram or a problem tree, which shows the core problems and the origins of each identified problem. The problem tree provides a good basis for subsequent planning steps and helps the community to understand the causes of malnutrition.
Then, the facilitator of the Participatory Needs Assessment process can list the problem areas mentioned by the villagers in a matrix. He or she prepares a column for men and women separately. Ranking exercises can be started and are helpful to find out peoples preferences. Each person has the chance to give a point (or another token such as stones or seeds) to a specific problem listed in the matrix. The problem with the highest ranking is given priority for the subsequent intervention planning
e) Institutional analysis through diagramming A useful tool for institutional analysis can be the elaboration of diagrams. Participants list on cards all NGOs, community organisations and government services which are working in the village or community as well as their specific activities. Then ask the participants which kind of relationship they have and what are the constraints of cooperation. The cards could be located in relationship to each other, so the links between the organisations and service provider could be visualised. Any conflict or potentials mentioned by the participants could be drawn on the cards for further discussion.
f) Other participatory methods
Step 3: Identifying activities to improve nutrition
The main steps to develop the necessary interventions are:
a) Establish one objective for each priority problem.
b) Examine the possible activities and alternatives to attain these objectives.
c) Establish realistic and feasible results within a specific time frame.
d) Mobilise the necessary institutional support and resources for project implementation.
e) Establish contact with local organizations to obtain technical assistance.
f) Negotiate with local organizations possible partnership relations and/or co-financial contracts.
g) Design a simple monitoring and evaluation matrix for each project at community level, including the areas to be monitored, the selected indicators and the use of the obtained information.
Step 4: Visualization and report writing
Something missing, unclear, misleading or a typo? Help us to make this page better!
Upon approval, the MethodFinder team will publish your comment here (* mandatory fields):